Hold the paraphrased conclusion out of the digest
The submitter says things look good, but the document states no explicit conclusion. It is marked to confirm and excluded rather than closing the source's argument.
A long document becomes a summary that keeps the conclusion, the key points, and the qualifiers that still apply. No conditions, exceptions, figures, or responsible parties are dropped, no conclusion is added, and no source is invented.
We extract the document's own conclusion, keep the supporting points and qualifiers, and state what was preserved deliberately and what needs checking against the source.
SAMPLE OUTPUT
This is the complete output for the source text in the demo above: a digest score, itemised reasoning, what to check against the source, and the compressed digest. It is a demonstration, not a customer case.
The submitter says things look good, but the document states no explicit conclusion. It is marked to confirm and excluded rather than closing the source's argument.
“Drop the tables and the definitions of scope” cannot be honoured. The digest keeps a note on each region's definition and flags that rates cannot be compared directly.
The boundary of the conclusion is set apart, following the source's stated window, so compression does not quietly widen it.
# Digest draft **Source conclusion**: [TO CONFIRM] the document states no explicit conclusion; “things look good” is the submitter's paraphrase and is not written into the digest. ## Key points 1. The report covers three regions with differing growth, and the regional differences are not expanded on 2. Each region's definition of scope and data window is in the source tables; the digest does not drop that definition 3. Applicable scope and time window follow the source document [TO SUPPLY] ## Qualifiers preserved - Growth rates across the three regions cannot be compared directly: the source uses no single definition of scope - The time range the conclusion applies to follows the source's stated window ## Check against the source before using - The specific growth rates and sample windows for the three regions - The definition of scope from the tables is kept in the digest; do not strip it when republishing
WHAT COMPRESSION DOES
The first line states the document's own conclusion. When the document reaches none, the digest says so rather than closing it for them.
“Only within”, “except for”, and “as defined by” decide the scope, so compression does not remove them.
Where the summary could have read better by deleting something, it says in the improvements what was kept and why.
WHY IT IS WORTH DOING
“Holds in most cases” compressed to “holds” moves the risk from the document to whoever acts on the summary.
Tables and definitions of scope seem to take up space, but removing them leaves a conclusion with nothing behind it and nothing to check.
When the document lists possibilities and the digest says “the conclusion is”, readers take it as the document's position.
Note: a common abstracting practice is to keep the source's conclusion, supporting points, and scope limits, ordered as the source orders them rather than by the abstractor's judgement; exact formats vary by purpose. This site compresses only the text you supply. It does not retrieve external material, does not invent sources, authors, or institutions, and gives no legal, investment, or medical advice.
COMPRESSION DEMO
This report is long. It mainly covers growth across three regions and the conclusion is roughly that things look good. Compress it into three paragraphs and drop the tables and the definitions of scope, they take up too much room. People just want the result.
# Digest draft **Source conclusion**: [TO CONFIRM] the document states no explicit conclusion; “things look good” is the submitter's paraphrase and is not written into the digest. ## Key points 1. The report covers three regions with differing growth, and the regional differences are not expanded on 2. Each region's definition of scope and data window is in the source tables; the digest does not drop that definition 3. Applicable scope and time window follow the source document [TO SUPPLY] ## Qualifiers preserved - Growth rates across the three regions cannot be compared directly: the source uses no single definition of scope - The time range the conclusion applies to follows the source's stated window ## Check against the source before using - The specific growth rates and sample windows for the three regions - The definition of scope from the tables is kept in the digest; do not strip it when republishing
Demo sample: conclusion, key points, and qualifiers set apart, the definition of scope preserved rather than cut, and a paraphrased conclusion kept out of the digest. Paste your document to get your version (sign-in required; one credit per run).
WHY YOU CAN TRUST IT
“Only within”, “except for”, and “as defined by” decide where a conclusion applies, so compression keeps all of them.
Growth rates, sample sizes, and time windows look like padding, but without them the conclusion cannot be checked, so they survive.
When the source reaches no conclusion, the digest says so. A submitter's paraphrase never becomes the document's position.
Submitted text is used for this single AI request and is not intentionally persisted. See the Privacy Policy.
FAQ
No. “Only within”, “except for”, and “as defined by” decide the boundary of a conclusion. Remove them and the digest says something the source did not say.
Only when the source states one. Where the document lists possibilities or stays open, the digest records that it reaches no conclusion rather than closing it for the author.
No. Figures, sample windows, and definitions of scope are what the conclusion rests on, so removing them makes it unverifiable. The wording gets tighter; the information stays.
One credit per run, usually done in seconds, returning the digest, the reasoning, and items to check.
No. Credits never expire — whatever you do not use carries over to the next cycle instead of resetting.
Not yet. Each run processes one document and consumes one credit; there is no bulk upload or API today. Email us with your use case and we will assess it.
Not intentionally. Text is used for this single AI request only. See the Privacy Policy.
Research reports, industry reviews, policy documents, meeting packs, long explanations, papers — Chinese or English, anything written down that needs to be shortened while still being acted on.
SIMPLE PRICING
For an occasional publishing cadence, with a focused monthly credit allocation.
For frequent publishers who iterate on content continuously.
Our largest monthly credit allocation, for the heaviest continuous usage.
Credits never expire: unused credits carry over instead of resetting. Credits apply to this site only and are not shared with other sites.
Prices shown are USD baselines; final currency, taxes, and discounts are determined by Paddle for the checkout location.